Deep Mind’s Goal is to ‘Solve Intelligence… and then Solve Everything Else.’

In the current flurry of activity concerning artificial intelligence (AI) and the writing crafts, you are perhaps unaware of the Google project named Deep Mind.

According to Google, “when we launched DeepMind back in 2010, many people thought general AI was a farfetched science fiction technology that was decades away from being a reality… Building ever more capable and general AI, safely and responsibly, demands that we solve some of the hardest scientific and engineering challenges of our time. For that, we need to work with greater speed, stronger collaboration and execution, and to simplify the way we make decisions to focus on achieving the biggest impact.”

Well, more than a decade has passed since 2010, but then it’s been 2,000 years since the first algorithm was written, so who am I to criticize?

But writers, composers, graphic artists and others who might be in the ‘everything else’ pathway are nervous, particularly as the writer’s strike in Hollywood proceeds. Does Stephen Colbert really need nineteen writers for The Late Show? That’s not an easily asked or answered question.

If that 2,000 year thing about the algorithm is stuck in your head, it was actually Euclid in ancient Greece who formulated a recipe that, if followed step by step solves the problem of ‘given two numbers, find the largest number that divides them both.’ That recipe is an algorithm, baby, even though there’s no computer under Euclid’s fingers. If you’re looking for a deep mind, he’s the go-to guy.

What concerns me is Google’s apparent need to work with greater speed, stronger collaboration and execution, and to simplify the way we make decisions to focus on achieving the biggest impact

Whose biggest impact?

We just (maybe, maybe not) got through Zuckerberg’s ‘move fast and break things’ dedication in the hands of what was then a 32-year-old kid’s eagerness to wreck the sand-castle in the name of profit. Now Musk is ripping apart Twitter for ‘freedom,’ when we know Elon’s definition of freedom is to keep his ego unchecked. I’ll say it again.

Whose biggest impact? Yours? Mine? The salvation of humanity?

The thought that sometimes gives me chills is that human progress moves on a long, slow, Darwinian track that allowed us to acclimate ourselves to the move from cave paintings to jet aircraft. But lately that technological track that reliably moved with carrot-and-stick comfort just a bit ahead of our expectations is headed straight up. We don’t yet know how to handle straight up.

Technology is a tool—I keep reminding myself of that—technology is a tool.

Tools are good, but for some folks computers teaching computers are a tool and it’s 2,000 years since Euclid.



Letters from Ceilia

Women who’ve read Letters from Ceilia are shocked that a man could have written it. The novel offers a profound exploration of the female psyche and experience. Jim Freeman's astute portrayal of a modern woman's journey resonates with young professionals and ambitious...

The Dark Side of the Moon: vol. 3

Mark Twain said “Everyone is a moon, and has a dark side which he never shows to anybody.” In this five-volume series, Jim Freeman uncovers that dark side and strives to shine light on it. 2006 was possibly the most pivotal year of the decade, with the wheels...

It’s Not That There Aren’t Enough Indians, but There Are Too Many Chiefs

You know who the Indians are in your organization, they’re the employees, from secretaries to team members, who actually get stuff done. They’re also the most likely to be working under more stress and less compensation that those who manage them, the chiefs we have...

Elon Musk, on “Lords and Peasants”

We’re talking about unions here, and the right to organize. Musk has been quoted as saying, “I just don’t like anything which creates a lords and peasants sort of thing. I think the unions naturally try to create negativity in a company.” Which is a really strange...